Skip Navigation


Chinese Journal of International Law Advance Access originally published online on January 30, 2009
Chinese Journal of International Law 2009 8(1):181-189; doi:10.1093/chinesejil/jmn046
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
8/1/181    most recent
jmn046v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yee, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

COURTS AND TRIBUNALS

Notes on the International Court of Justice (Part 2): Reform Proposals Regarding the International Court of Justice—A Preliminary Report for the International Law Association Study Group on United Nations Reform

Sienho Yee*

Correspondence: * University Professor and Chair of the Academic Committee, Wuhan University Institute of International Law, China (email: sienho{at}chinesejil.org). The paper was completed on 2 August 2008 for the International Law Association Study Group on United Nations Reform. This Preliminary Report was intended to be a survey on the more significant proposals, not a detailed treatment of any of them. I am grateful to President Dame Rosalyn Higgins of the ICJ and Dr Ralph Wilde, Special Rapporteur of the ILA Study Group, for valuable comments and to Ingrid Kost, Curator of the Peace Palace Library for research assistance. All responsibility is mine alone. Comments are welcome.

Written for the International Law Association Study Group on UN Reform, this Preliminary Report reviews the more significant reform proposals regarding the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and makes some suggestions for further consideration such as the appropriateness of an ICJ Bar and a Model Code of Conduct for practice before the ICJ, the role of the ICJ and its heavy caseload, and possible coalitions to promote the ICJ.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.