Skip Navigation


Chinese Journal of International Law Advance Access originally published online on May 22, 2008
Chinese Journal of International Law 2008 7(2):285-306; doi:10.1093/chinesejil/jmn020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
7/2/285    most recent
jmn020v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reinisch, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

The Immunity of International Organizations and the Jurisdiction of their Administrative Tribunals

August Reinisch *

International organizations regularly enjoy immunity from suit in employment-related cases. Instead of litigation before various national courts, staff members are supposed to bring their complaints before internal grievance mechanisms and ultimately before administrative tribunals set up by the organizations. The scope of jurisdiction of such administrative tribunals largely covers the kind of staff disputes insulated from national court scrutiny as a result of the immunity from legal process enjoyed by international organizations. Inspired by the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, in particular its 1999 Waite and Kennedy judgment according to which the jurisdictional immunity of international organizations may depend upon the availability of "reasonable alternative means" to protect effectively the rights of staff members, more and more national courts are equally looking at the availability and adequacy of alternative dispute settlement mechanisms. Some of them have even concluded that the non-availability of legal protection through an administrative tribunal or the inadequacy of the level of protection afforded by internal mechanisms justifies a withdrawal of immunity in order to avoid a denial of justice contrary to human rights demands.


* Professor of International and European Law at the University of Vienna, Austria, and Professorial Lecturer at the Bologna Center of SAIS/Johns Hopkins University in Bologna, Italy (email: august.reinisch{at}univie.ac.at). This paper was completed in March 2008. The author would like to thank Jakob Wurm for his excellent research assistance. This paper is based on the author's presentation in the framework of the Conference "International Administrative Tribunals in a Changing World" organized by the UN Administrative Tribunal with the co-sponsorship of the NYU Law School Institute for International Law and Justice on 9 November 2007 at UN Headquarters in New York.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.