Skip Navigation

Chinese Journal of International Law 2007 6(3):789-792; doi:10.1093/chinesejil/jmm040
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LIU, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved

SCHOLARS' COMMUNITY

Should the Principle of Ne Bis in Idem also Be Taken into Consideration? A Response to Yarwood and Dold

LIU Daqun *

This note responds to an earlier article and argues that the principle of ne bis in idemshould be taken into consideration in deciding whether the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda should refer a case to a national government for prosecution.

* Judge of the ICTY. The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and not those of the Tribunals or the United Nations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.